Runwork for Design Teams
The brief your AI nailed last month, gone with the chat.
You spent an hour teaching your AI your brand voice and how you want feedback structured, and it got good. That work is now somewhere in a chat history. On Runwork it becomes a team skill, so every designer's AI starts from it.
Powered By
The Challenge
- The hour you spent teaching your AI your brand voice went with the chat
- Every designer's AI writes briefs and feedback its own way
- Assets are findable, the rules for using them are not
- New designers start from zero on prompts someone already perfected
- You can't see who is carrying what until someone is already buried
The Runwork Solution
- Your brand voice and brief format kept as a team skill, ready in every designer's AI
- One intake for requests, scored the way your team agreed
- Assets in one place with versions and usage rules attached
- Feedback that comes back structured enough for your AI to work from
- Capacity and design system drift visible without asking anyone
What your team gets
Your brand voice, in everyone's AI
The tone and the rules you worked out once, kept as a team skill. A new designer has it on day one instead of month three.
Briefs that arrive usable
One intake form, scored by deadline and requester, so make it pop turns into something a designer can actually start from.
An asset library with the rules attached
Logos, templates and source files with version history and usage rights in the same place. Share a link instead of downloading and re-uploading.
Feedback in one shape
Stakeholders annotate and approve in one place, and what comes back is structured, not five opinions in three tools.
An honest capacity answer
Who is at 90% and who is at 60%, visible before you promise anyone a date.
Design system drift you catch early
Component usage tracked across products, with deprecated versions flagged and the teams still on them named.
A Day in the Life
8:30 AM: Request triage. Seven requests came in overnight. The request portal scored them by deadline, requester and project type while you were asleep. Three are urgent, two are too vague to start, and the workflow already went back to those two asking the questions your team always ends up asking.
10:00 AM: Asset hunt. Marketing needs the Q3 campaign logos on transparent backgrounds. You search the asset library instead of three drives. Found in seconds, with version history and usage rights attached. You send the link and nobody re-uploads anything.
11:00 AM: The new designer's first brief. She started Monday. Her AI already writes in your brand voice, asks the questions your briefs need, and knows which words you never use, because you taught yours that in January and saved it as a team skill. She did not read a 40-page guideline PDF. She just got a first draft that sounds like your brand.
1:00 PM: Feedback collection. The homepage redesign needs sign-off. You share it through the feedback collector, stakeholders annotate on the design itself and approve their own section. What comes back is structured, so your AI can turn it into a revision list instead of you rereading a Slack thread.
3:00 PM: Workload check. Product wants to know when you can take their dashboard redesign. The workload view says two designers are at 90% and one is at 60%. You give a real date, and you can show why.
4:30 PM: Design system audit. The new button is used in 47 places. Two teams are still on the deprecated one, and the automation flagged them without you asking. On the team dashboard you notice the other half of it: four of your six designers used the brand voice skill this week, and the two who did not are the two whose work keeps coming back for another round.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do we keep the brand voice we taught our AI?
Do our designers have to switch tools?
What about requests, assets and feedback?
Can we tell whether the team is actually using any of this?
Related Use Cases
Start keeping what your team figures out.
Start a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.